Reply To: Fundamental Principles to be documented within our constitution

[Anonymous]

#1396

My 2 cents.
One point that should have been should have been raised is that for us to be really traditionalists, we have to be prepared to state that we defend the right of Australia’s founding people to remain the dominate demographic. A white Australia.

I do not believe that that you can have a traditional society without the people who created it. All the beliefs, customs and culture that I want to preserve come from white people. This is where conservatives have failed. They have not conserved the people with their principles. Without the people, everything else is meaningless.

I reject the idea that if you just keep to conservative principles, a traditional white society can be maintained. If the majority became ethnic Chinese or African then Australia would look more like a Chinese or African country then traditional Australian.

So multiculturalism and diversity must be rejected. Equality too must also be rejected for in order to maintain a white majority. People must be rejected on the colour of their skin, that is their race, not the content of their character.

Because if my white children are to have a future in this country they must be part of the majority. I think the example of Rhodesia shows that institutions and principles will always fail when up against blood.

Now I understand that some of the members may have non white partners or may not be pure white themselves. I don’t think that matters. What does matter is a commitment to a white majority and white privilege. Non whites must be discriminated against in order to demonstrate that they will remain eternal outsiders and their presence is unwelcome.

In doing so we show out commitment to preserving the country that my ancestors fought for and making sure my children get in turn what I was able to inherit from my parents.